UD Scholarly Communication News

This blog serves to keep staff informed about current issues related to scholarly communication.  The intended audience is UD library personnel.  Please feel free to send the Scholarly Communication  Officer relevant material you would like to see posted.

News and Commentary

Being a scholar in the digital era : Transforming scholarly practice for the public good

by Jessie Daniels and Polly Thistlethwaite
Available in UD Library as an ebook

 

ACRL Comments on NSF Strategic Plan

Posted: 27 Sep 2016 09:00 AM PDT

On September 26, 2016, ACRL provided feedback to the National Science Foundation (NSF) in preparation for updates to its Strategic Plan. As reflected in previous ACRL support for governmental policies and legislation that facilitate open access and open education, including the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) mandate (mentioned in the NSF strategic plan) and the Fair Access to Science & Technology Research Act and Federal Research Public Access Act bills, ACRL is fundamentally committed to the open exchange of information to empower individuals and facilitate scientific discovery. In the comments to NSF, ACRL offered six recommendations to allow for research data and articles to be freely shared:

  1. Accelerate scientific discovery by encouraging the use of the shortest possible – or no – embargo period for access to NSF-funded publications;
  2. Improve the discoverability, utility and value of NSF-funded articles by depositing them in the PubMed Central repository, which currently houses more than four million articles from the NIH and six other Federal agencies in a standardized, machine-readable XML format;
  3. “Public access” is not “open access” – ensure that NSF articles meet OSTP requirements for enabling productive reuses – including computational analysis, and text and data mining – by requiring the use of a standard open license;
  4. The OSTP memorandum of February, 2013 speaks equally to public access to scientific publications and to scientific data in digital formats. NSF should improve the Agency’s accountability and transparency by requiring that data underlying NSF articles needed to validate/reproduce the articles’ conclusions be made publicly available upon publication;
  5. Incentivize NSF researchers to freely and quickly share articles and their underlying data through funding reviews and promotion processes; and
  6. Further improve NSF’s accountability and transparency by establishing a publicly accessible mechanism to track policy compliance results, including reporting on the number of articles produced from NSF-funded research, and how many are publicly accessible.

Read more in ACRL’s full feedback to NSF.


 

What if I told you that nearly 90 percent of the publications which have profoundly influenced the life sciences did not appear in a high-impact factor journal?

Want to Change Academic Publishing? Just Say No

JHf_h0wI47nIqkciLdl8CDl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVvK0kTmF0xjctABnaLJIm9


 

SocArXiv

Open and Shut?: SocArXiv debuts, as SSRN acquisition comes under scrutiny

Posted: 20 Jul 2016 09:37 AM EDT

“The arrival of a new preprint server for the social sciences called SocArXiv comes just a month after news that Elsevier is acquiring the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), a preprint repository and online community founded in 1994 by two researchers.”

Is it time for authors to leave SSRN? | Authors Alliance

Posted: 20 Jul 2016 09:29 AM EDT

“Reports are surfacing that, without notice, SSRN is removing author-posted documents following SSRN’s own, opaque determination that the author must have transferred copyright, the publisher had not consented to the posting, or where the author has opted to use a non-commercial Creative Commons license.”


 

ACRL issues policy statement on open access to scholarship by academic librarians

Posted: July 12, 2016, 12:17 PM

In support of broad and timely dissemination of library and information science scholarship, the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) encourages academic librarians to publish in open access journals.   http://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2016/07/acrl-issues-policy-statement-open-access-scholarship-academic-librarians


 

Global interest in a European landmark library copyright case

Quick links to the recording and slides.

Participants at a recent EIFL webinar were treated by a leading lawyer involved in the ‘TU Darmstadt’ case to a concise analysis of the key issues decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning use of copyright protected works by a library…

The case is regarded as a significant boost for European libraries to digitize works in their collections and to make them available in library reading rooms. Since EU law has an important influence beyond Europe, the decision is also important for libraries outside Europe.


July 1, 2016 is day one for this blog and I wish to open with some commentary on scholarly communication and undergraduate education.

The Time is Now: Scholarly Communication and Undergraduates | ACRLog
Posted: 30 Jun 2016 05:49 AM PDT

“Most of our efforts to move the system closer to openness seem to focus on helping faculty understand the importance and impact of making their work open. This is a start but it is clear that out of all of the populations that the library engages, this group has perhaps the most developed and ingrained practices for sharing their work. I’m not implying that we shouldn’t try to work with faculty. But I am asserting that we aren’t doing enough to engage graduate students and undergraduate students. Yes, you read that right. Undergraduate students.”


Thinking of Data

Amsterdam Universities Select Figshare For Institutions to Manage Their Research Data | figshare
Posted: 30 Jun 2016 06:11 AM PDT

“We’re delighted to announce The University of Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences have chosen figshare for Institutions to help lead the charge after historic call by the EU for more open research.”

Cc0 88x31.png

CC0 (read “CC Zero”) is a universal public domain dedication that may be used by anyone wishing to permanently surrender the copyright and database rights (where they exist) they may have in a work, thereby placing it as nearly as possible into the public domain. CC0 is a legal tool that improves on the “dedication” function of our earlier, U.S.-centric public domain dedication and certification. CC0 is universal in form and may be used throughout the world for any kind of content without adaptation to account for laws in different jurisdictions. And like our licenses, CC0 has the benefit of being expressed in three ways – legal code, a human readable deed, and machine-readable code that allows works distributed under CC0 to be easily found.

CC0 can be particularly important for the sharing of data and databases, since it otherwise may be unclear whether highly factual data and databases are restricted by copyright or other rights. Databases may contain facts that, in and of themselves, are not protected by copyright law. However, the copyright laws of many jurisdictions cover creatively selected or arranged compilations of facts and creative database design and structure, and some jurisdictions like those in the European Union have enacted additional sui generis laws that restrict uses of databases without regard for applicable copyright law. CC0 is intended to cover all copyright and database rights, so that however data and databases are restricted (under copyright or otherwise), those rights are all surrendered. CC0 is also particularly relevant to scientific data. An opinion piece in Nature on “Post-publication sharing of data and tools” explicitly recommends open sharing and the use of CC0 to put data in the public domain:

“Although it is usual practice for major public databases to make data freely available to access and use, any restrictions on use should be strongly resisted and we endorse explicit encouragement of open sharing, for example under the newly available CC0 public domain waiver of Creative Commons.”


 Using ResearchGate?

A social networking site is not an open access repository
Posted: 1 Jul 2016

“What’s the difference between ResearchGate, Academia.edu, and the institutional repository?”
“I put my papers in ResearchGate, is that enough for the open access policy?

These and similar questions have been been common at open access events over the past couple of years. Authors want to better understand the differences between these platforms and when they should use one, the other, or some combination.


Important considerations for new researchers, and maybe some that are not so new

30 Day Challege: The Ultimate Guide to Raising the Profile of Your Research

30 Day Challege: The Ultimate Guide to Raising the Profile of Your Research. http://blog.impactstory.org/research-impact-challenge-ebook/

30 Day Challege: The Ultimate Guide to Raising the Profile of Your Research. http://blog.impactstory.org/research-impact-challenge-ebook/

Close This